Paul Graham: why the art world simply does not get photography

A friend of mine (thanks Yannick !) recently forwarded me a link towards Paul Graham website. In a presentation during the MOMA photography forum, the British artist expressed an interesting point of view on why photography “for and of itself” (as opposed to photography deployed as an artistic strategy by more conceptual artists) is often overlooked by contemporary art curators and dealers.

From Paul Graham’s words: “The broader art world has no problems with the work of Jeff Wall, or Cindy Sherman or James Casebere or Thomas Demand partly because the creative process in the work is clear and plain to see, and it can be easily articulated and understood what the artist did: Thomas Demand constructs his elaborate sculptural creations over many weeks before photographing them; Cindy Sherman develops, acts and performs in her self-portraits. In each case the handiwork of the artist is readily apparent: something was synthesized, staged, constructed or performed. The dealer can explain this to the client, the curator to the public, the art writer to their readers, etc. The problem is that whilst you can discuss what Jeff Wall did in an elaborately staged street tableaux, how do you explain what Garry Winogrand did on a real New York street when he ‘just’ took the picture ?”.